Dr. Ross de Belle is not the type to take it easy.ÌęÌę
In 2020 the pediatrician, now 86, had only just retired from his Brossard practiceâyes, he worked until he was well into his eightiesâwhen the global COVID-19 disruption unexpectedly created the perfect conditions for staying in one place and focusing his energies on a single project. He didnât have to look far to find an ideal one.Ìę
Dr. de Belleâs paternal grandfather, Charles de Belle, was a painter who died in 1939, the year after his grandson Ross was born. Learning about the eccentric Charlesâ life and work through stories from his father, Louis, Ross came to a gradual appreciation over the following decades of his grandfatherâs artistic achievement. Finally, believing it was high time there was a book about him, he set about making one, with practical assistance from various family members. The result, , proves to be a revelation, shining a light on a long-neglected figure whose work stands with the best of his era.Ìę
âHe had such a unique talent,â said the ebullient de Belle in August, on the phone from the lakeside Pointe-Claire condo where he lives with his wife Kathryn McCloskey. âAnd he was such an odd character. I felt a sense of mission to make him better known.âÌę
It says something about Charles de Belleâs low-key Montreal profile that his best-known work locallyâthe 1920 painting âIn Flanders Fields,â gifted to Âé¶čAV that same yearâwas seen only by people who happened to look up at where it was hung in the Strathcona Anatomy Building before it eventually got lost in the netherworld of archival storage. For nearly everyone coming to his work now, Heavenly will be an introduction, one thatâs likely to beg a question: how could work of such obvious distinction have slipped into near-total obscurity? Part of the answer, it seems, goes back as far as the artistâs lifetime and his inherent disinclination to deal much with the commercial realm. As a chapter title in the book dryly puts it, he was âNot a Good Salesman.âÌę
âHe liked to say, âA painter paints to live, an artist lives to paint,ââ said de Belle of his grandfatherâs credo. âAnd he clearly thought of himself as an artist. All he thought about, day and night, was his art.âÌę
As for the prickliness that may well have made potential buyers wary, the stories are many.Ìę
âMy father told me that, especially as his father got older, he would go into rages,â de Belle said. âHeâd step onto the bus or a streetcar and if some young fellow was sitting and not giving a woman his seat, heâd knock him on the knee with his cane and shout, âGet up!ââÌęÌę
Social niceties sometimes took a back seat in other settings, too. Sometimes at family gatherings, said de Belle, âHe would walk around looking at the artworks on the walls and say, âThese paintings are terrible! Let me give you one of mine.ââÌę
A slim, elegantly designed book, Heavenly is a quick read. Acknowledging a relative paucity of surviving firsthand material on his grandfatherâs life, de Belle makes efficient use of whatâs available, keeping the narrative moving briskly along while allowing himself some speculative scope when itâs directly relevant to specific works. Whatâs here is absorbing enough, though. In addition to considerable family intrigue, events in the broader world make their presence felt: war, British royalty and a close brush with the first and last voyage of the Titanic are no more than a degree or two removed from centre stage. But generally the images are allowed to do the heavy lifting, and theyâre more than equal to the task.Ìę
Among the works reproduced in Heavenly, an undoubted highlight is âLouis,â a portrait of the artistâs son (and the author's father), made when the subject was in his early teens. With its classical-style composition and sombre tones, it would look at home alongside a Whistler or a Sargent; indeed, Whistler was briefly Charlesâ tutor. In a practice common in the Victorian and Edwardian erasâa time still fresh in the popular mind, both in Europe where the artist first made his name and in Quebec, where he settled in 1912âthe boy in the painting could easily be taken for a young woman.Ìę
âMy guess, knowing a bit about psychology and psychiatry, is that he wanted to acknowledge and recognize his son (by doing a portrait), but not having been fond of his own fatherâwho was a bit of a scoundrelâhe dressed the subject in black and made him look like a girl.âÌę
In addition to hints of a cross-generation dynamic with complicated undertones, some more prosaic factors had a hand in Charles de Belleâs artistic process.Ìę
âLate in his life he had arthritis in his fingers, which made working in pastels too difficult,â said de Belle. âSo he turned to oils. Itâs a tribute to his skill that he was able to manipulate oils to resemble the delicacy of pastels.âÌęÌęÌęÌę
In the piece chosen for the bookâs cover, a group study of four young women is complemented by ghost-like presences emerging dimly from the soft-focus backdrop; the haunting effect calls to mind Chagall. As with âLouis,â the resemblance to a predecessorâs style feels more like organic kinship than conscious homage.ÌęÌę
Itâs important not to overplay the âpovertyâ component of the bookâs subtitleâitâs not as if Charles de Belle didnât sell at all while he was alive. Heavenly includes a story of a group of Queen Victoriaâs ladies-in-waiting making an impromptu visit to the artistâs London studio and promptly facilitating a lucrative sale of three pastels to the Queen herself. Closer to home, said de Belle, one of Charlesâ buyers was the wealthy father of one-time Quebec Premier Jacques Parizeau. Whatâs more, indications are that, even if he did show a certain disdain for the pursuit of money, Charles was far from indifferent to the idea of posterity. He took great care, for example, to store his vulnerable pastel works between panes of glass. Ìę
âHe wanted to create something of beauty, something that would last,â said de Belle. âHe wanted to express something that people would remember, and that would make them happy.âÌę
For de Belle, the experience of creating Heavenly has had a satisfying full-circle aspect, not least because of its connections with his alma mater. When he mentions that the book is now in the collection at the Osler Library of the History of Medicine, the pride in his voice is palpable. Whatâs more, having had a long and rewarding career, he relishes the chance to pay some of it forward to the place that helped set him on his path.ÌęÌę
âI didnât do this to make a lot of money,â he said. âI want a portion of the royalties to be given as a reward to Âé¶čAV.â
Ìę