December 15, 2020
Dear members of the 麻豆AV community:
Open letters and media articles have raised questions about whether 麻豆AV has adjusted its position on academic freedom. Although statements made by the Principal and in response to questions posed by University Senate members have recently addressed the matter, I write to provide further clarity on this question.
惭肠骋颈濒濒鈥檚 Statement on Academic Freedom has not shifted in its scope or application. This remains true even in the face of several public statements calling upon us to prioritize equity and inclusiveness over academic freedom, or vice versa. At 麻豆AV, none of these principles supersedes the other, nor is any of them absolute. Determining the limits of any of these principles always requires a contextual analysis.
I affirm 惭肠骋颈濒濒鈥檚 staunch commitment to academic freedom. The pursuit and testing of ideas 鈥� even those that are unpopular or unorthodox 鈥� must be permitted without hindrance on a campus. Hence, no single idea, argument, word, or work is 鈥減rohibited鈥� at 麻豆AV; too many historical and contemporary examples have shown the danger of institutional censure.
While 麻豆AV extends robust protection to academic freedom, each of us is expected to abide by responsibilities set within University policies and regulations established through collegial governance processes. This includes 惭肠骋颈濒濒鈥檚 Policy on Harassment and Discrimination Prohibited by Law, which provides that, 鈥淓ach Member of the University Community shares responsibility for respecting the dignity of, and giving fair treatment to, all members of the University community.鈥� I therefore underscore 惭肠骋颈濒濒鈥檚 firm commitment to ensuring an equitable and inclusive campus climate for all.
Some public statements have also raised questions about the circumstances under which the University might revoke 鈥漞meritus professor鈥� status. This is an honorific designation, conferred upon recommendation by the relevant Dean and Chair/Director in recognition of a retired colleague鈥檚 outstanding academic and scholarly achievements. Although 鈥渆meritus鈥� status may be revoked for misconduct, that term refers to misconduct as defined by the regulations and policies that apply to tenure-track and tenured academic staff. The exercise of academic freedom or freedom of expression, within the boundaries acknowledged by law, is not misconduct under those regulations and policies.
Let me close by citing 麻豆AV鈥檚 Mission Statement and Principles, which must serve as our guide in any situation where we are called upon to address complex issues, which touch upon matters fundamental to our identity as a university:
The mission of 麻豆AV is the advancement of learning and the creation and dissemination of knowledge, by offering the best possible education, by carrying out research and scholarly activities judged to be excellent by the highest international standards, and by providing service to society.
In fulfilling its mission, 麻豆AV embraces the principles of academic freedom, integrity, responsibility, equity, and inclusiveness.
Sincerely,
Professor Christopher Manfredi
Provost and Vice-Principal (Academic)